There is a power in stepping into someone else’s shoes, as the old American expression goes. But it must be done without stepping on the toes of the person who owns them. What one does in deciding to don the accoutrements and attire of the Other is symbolically place oneself into their subject(ive) position. When that act of embodying is recorded into a picture, the clothing and the photographic subject all become elements placed into a larger conversation with environmental elements such as other people, buildings, or other objects in the culture. This is one way to place objects and people from different nations, places, and cultures into direct semiotic (aesthetic) conversation. And when the conversation is part of a good faith effort to promote bridge building and promote direct, empathetic understanding, much can be learned.
My work these days involves the concept of social empathy and the notion of glocal (where global ideas find specific and unique expression locally) culture. My argument has long been that the social (and media) practice of fashion in Korea is inherently and highly communicative to the point of being a near-medium unto itself. Korean street fashion kids, for example, also take international ideas, brands, and trends and localize them into their disctinctive forms we see on the Korean streets here and these bounce out again across the world through platforms such as Instagram, YouTube, and Facebook, which Korean youth have mastered astonishingly well and quickly. In short, I have come to a point where I feel it possible to use fashion as a communicative medium through which to actively promote higher degrees of social empathy and understanding across borders. My main partner in this project is Dr. Kieu-Linh Caroline Valverde, a professor of Asian American Studies at the University of California, Davis who research and writes on national dress, branding, and fashion culture. The main pillar of support for the project is her New Viet Nam Studies Center at UC Davis. We think there is a lot going on in Vietnam and Korea, as well as between Vietnam and Korea, especially through the medium of dress. And this is the first step in an area I myself have been exploring ever since I started trying to remix the Korean hanbok with non-Korean bodies in my photography to reflect the already ongoing trend of lots of non-Korean people already becoming excited about wearing the Korean hanbok.
Our project’s power lies in pictures, in the realm of visuality. It depends on a directly felt form of social empathy, which we call the fashion(ed) gaze. This idea depends on an long-established but little discussed idea in critical dance theory called kinaesthetic empathy, which is the idea that people experience a direct, instinctive urge to mirror or respond to the physical motions of another person. This is what lies behind the thrill we see when we watch dance or the heavily choreographic “dance” of heroes in balletic motion in action films. We see amazing moves and want to mirror or mimic them, but we cannot, since we are stuck in our chairs. The tension we feel between wanting to move but being unable to is why we feel an embodied thrill. The idea we are extending here is that when we see someone dressed impeccably in today’s consumer culture, we also feel an embodied thrill in the tension between wanting to fashion ourselves after that person’s fashion, but we cannot in that very moment. So this is more than mere consumer desire — it is an embodied desire to become the other. We imagine ourselves as occupying their shoes.
And what is telling is how many tourists love to put on the clothing of the people in the places they go. Take the business of donning the yellow robes of a Chinese emperor at the Great Wall (for a small fee, of course) — we get our thrill and snap a picture to preserve that feeling for the future. We temporarily embody the Others around us and at least try to taste a modicum of their reality. It may be superficial and it is certainly fleeting; but it is part of the fun of traveling, part of the value inherent in the endeavor itself. But more important than anything else, donning the robes of a Chinese emperor or what many Asian tourist do in Korea — renting and wearing a traditional hanbok — allows a brief contact with the holy grail of the tourist experience — experiencing the authenticity of the culture. This is the thrill we experience when we stand near an object actually owned or worn by a king, queen, or any revered figure, whether the scepter of a king, the jacket worn by Elvis, or a Gutenberg Bible. We can momentarily — through the magic of transference —access the those we revere.
But the difference between accessing being near a royal scepter in a museum versus putting on the robes of an emperor in the very place where he once ruled is the difference between feeling a “cool authenticity” in the head and the “hot authenticity” in the heart that can be had by embodying the experience one wants to feel. This project tries to make connections through the embodied experience of walking in someone else’s shoes in that very mode of hot authenticity in which one can more easily feel empathy for others and express that through the camera.
Right now, Korean style is hot. A Korean mode as defined through dress, music, makeup , and even comportment (what many refer to as the “Korean Wave”) runs dominant throughout Asia and finds great resonance in Vietnam. My ability to even be able to meet, let alone shoot, one of Vietnam’s top models and influencers would not have been possible without such a powerful clothing brand that represented pure, distilled, 180-proof Korean cool for Salim to want so eagerly to embody, picture, and add to her street cred amongst her domestic followers.
The project is actually a kind of sartorial elicitation project designed to provoke a response in the model, which when is recorded in the nexus between the photographer, model, and camera that we see as a picture, becomes a conduit for eliciting social empathy through the fashioned gaze of the viewer. As we have come to see ourselves more and more as the sum total of the things we buy and display, as the layers we place over the true, inner self only we can know, we have become a society in which individuals define one another by our digital avatars and the things we say in cyberspace, but the clothing we drape ourselves in becomes even more important as markers of group belonging and the identity politics of the public, social world.
Especially since clothing and style has become a big part of the Instagram economy and social media spreads notions and brands across the world (especially as national brands), the sartorial acts of people who choose to cast their images across the Internet have become as more meaningful as the number of people choosing to engage in public modeling, fashion, and photography work has increased. Our project’s goal is to get in front that process of sartorial signifying in digital media and actively use the process to build stronger, sounder bridges of understanding across increasingly connected cultures. Put more simply, we’re trying to connect people (who want to be connected) across borders through art.
This is where art meets social science. where my subfield of Visual Sociology becomes something more than a passively analytical pursuit. What we are trying to create is an proactive, activist push to increase emphathetic understanding across national borders in a way that is already happening at a quiet level, but which could help focus, amplify, and steer things into a more constructive and purposeful direction as a socially beneficial project.